On dividing a resistance, the existence of viruses, ‘the COVID response’, & spreading-non-deadly threats
The virus/origins of the virus don’t matter, some say, what matters is the RESPONSE.2This position may appear well-meaning, yet it is flawed.It absolutely matters whether a novel coronavirus was “spreading,” because this was the terminology used to scare the populace, shut down schools and places of worship, hurt industries, and justify deployment of a dedicated shot.For both of us, the biggest lie told by governing authorities wasn’t there is a virus or there is a novel virus. It was something is spreading — a la the 15 Days to Slow the Spread propaganda campaign.Based on everything we’ve investigated and analyzed, including two places that reported extremely fast and high-magnitude death events in spring 2020 (New York and Bergamo), we see no evidence of spread and no reason that even one hour of thought – let alone 15 days, 30 more days, and beyond – should have been dedicated to considering a ‘response’ to a non-existent threat.If there was dispersal of a pathogen, infectious clone, poison, or “signal” in certain locations, it was not via person to person transmission or spread but via one or more direct methods such as testing reagents, swabs, oxygen tanks, or similar mechanisms.
The good news is: as soon as THEY have something better or as good as a vaccine to affect us THEY will be more obliging to those who opt out of vaccines but then what? What will the new thing be? Vaccines seem so primitive to me considering all the technological possibilities. Of course by all means necessary as well no doubt. But to what extent? Real harm? No doubt, that seems to be the modus operandi. Hobble the masses. I’m currently concerned about what they are injecting the animals we eat with. How far that can affect us. No one seems to be deep diving into that! Well, in the podcasts/news I know of. And what if mRNA vaccines are being administered to chickens, cows, etc., how would that affect us?