Author: Tim

https://open.substack.com/pub/peggyhall/p/del-says-his-vaccine-confidence-bill?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=zbm9

Del said that this bill was “too clever” for some people to understand and that it was a “Trojan horse” meant to pave the way for more vaccine testing. I’m not in favor of vaccine testing at all. I’m certainly not in favor of testing childhood vaccines on children. This is what Del Bigtree stands for, and this is what RFK Jr. stands for. I hope you will watch Del Bigtree’s episode 376, where he states that this bill does not override other exemptions. So then, why do we need it? That was one of my criticisms: we don’t need more laws, and we certainly don’t need a law that states that if a vaccine has been approved by the FDA after being tested for one year against a placebo or another vaccine it can be required, it promotes the use of vaccines and confidence in the FDA.

National and worldwide vaccination programs and US-FDA vaccine non-regulation as among the longest of long cons. Learn to distrust pharma, FDA, Congress, vaccination, vaccine-regulation, and ‘vaccine confidence’ promotional campaigns. For more than 100 years, confidence men (con men) have been inducing marks to accept real chronic disease and sudden death, caused by vaccination, in exchange for false protection against communicable disease, by deceiving marks into believing the lie that communicable disea

Source: (35) National and worldwide vaccination programs and US-FDA vaccine non-regulation as among the longest of long cons.

Miles Mathis reports:

We are seeing the same thing today with the 9th
Circuit Court of Appeals ruling the Covid vaccines are
not vaccines. Looks like Pfizer forgot to pay off these judges. In arguments the CDC admitted the
vaccines were not vaccines, conferring no immunity and only (allegedly) mitigating symptoms. That is
a treatment, not a vaccine. This confirms what some of us have been screaming for years, to no avail.
It was obvious to anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of medicine or history that these were not
vaccines, which is why I called them fake vaccines or faux-vaccines. They were called vaccines only to
finagle legal immunity for the drug companies and qualify them for government pushing. That and to
capture public trust.
This is being reported by alternative sites like Zerohedge and Infowars, so as usual I did a general
search, to see how widely it was being reported in the mainstream. As I expected, it has been buried.
Most big mainstream news agencies are not just burying it, they are not reporting it at all. Bing
returned zero results in a general search for this from mainstream news agencies. Other mysterious
new sites are being toplisted, claiming that isn’t what the judgment says. In other words, the CIA and
Alphabet are burying it by their own sneaky methods, by downlisting it, censoring it, or lying about it.
Pfizer didn’t need to buy these judges because they already own the media. In that way they can just
fail to report it or assure you the judges didn’t say what they said.

A reader at Hana’s Substack suggested that health care workers would not have and do not commit intentional acts to harm patients, because they would have been and are concerned about losing their medical licenses. My reply, expanded: The HCWs licenses were and are on the line only to the extent they refused/refuse the orders to follow the death protocols, because the death protocols were and are covered by the PREP Act declarations, and the only liability vulnerability a HCW faces, during active PREP Act

Source: (30) On hospital and nursing home death protocols.

https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/p/hpv-vaccine?publication_id=730345&utm_campaign=548354&r=zbm9&utm_medium=email

There is no ‘top trumps’ on the worst of vaccines that include an aluminium adjuvant. However, so-called vaccines against the human papilloma virus (HPV) must give most a run for their money.

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/pediatric-perspectives-with-paul-thomas/whats-in-a-vaccine-w/-suzanne-humphries-md/?utm_source=luminate&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=chdtv&utm_id=20240520

What’s In A Vaccine? With Suzanne Humphries, M.D.
Dr. Suzanne Humphries returns to ‘Pediatric Perspectives’ for an invigorating conversation on the observable contrasts between the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, how immunizations affect the immune system, ingredients in the shots, types of injections, standards for developmental milestones, disease prevalence and more.